<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why A Biased Press Has Decided To Openly Back Barack Obama Over Hillary Clinton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/</link>
	<description>Commentary &#038; Journalistic Satire (And a bit of media advice to boot)</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rossie Jordan</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-19516</link>
		<dc:creator>Rossie Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-19516</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the material, it is interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the material, it is interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WellinformeD</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-14411</link>
		<dc:creator>WellinformeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-14411</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot, this material is very interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, this material is very interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karl</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-4244</link>
		<dc:creator>karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-4244</guid>
		<description>Only the low-rent section of hell will do for CNN and Fox "News"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only the low-rent section of hell will do for CNN and Fox &#8220;News&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why CNN is the Devil (in disguise) &#171; Red Pill Politics</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-4110</link>
		<dc:creator>Why CNN is the Devil (in disguise) &#171; Red Pill Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-4110</guid>
		<description>[...] Related Content:  Everyone&#8217;s an Expert on the Latino Vote, except Latinos  Another blogger who sees the Devil&#8217;s workings Other pissed off Asian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related Content:  Everyone&#8217;s an Expert on the Latino Vote, except Latinos  Another blogger who sees the Devil&#8217;s workings Other pissed off Asian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Parker</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 06:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>I agree with this article and have been shattered to see our "objective" news media turn to sensationalism. It does appear to show Obama in the most positive light and attempt to suppress the successes of Hillary Clinton. It can be subtle, until you spend sufficient time watching. I saw a recent CNN "news report" during which a newscaster stated that Bill Clinton had just yelled at reporters about their stories on his statements about Obama during the South Carolina campaigning. Then to illustrate, CNN cut to video of Bill Clinton very CALMLY and steadily addressing a reporter and saying something like "you guys (media) are making this into something it isn't, you're stirring the pot." THAT was their example of Bill Clinton yelling. He was not only clearly NOT yelling, but his statement seemed very appropriate in light of ridiculousness of the pre-South Carolina primary. And the CNN report made his point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this article and have been shattered to see our &#8220;objective&#8221; news media turn to sensationalism. It does appear to show Obama in the most positive light and attempt to suppress the successes of Hillary Clinton. It can be subtle, until you spend sufficient time watching. I saw a recent CNN &#8220;news report&#8221; during which a newscaster stated that Bill Clinton had just yelled at reporters about their stories on his statements about Obama during the South Carolina campaigning. Then to illustrate, CNN cut to video of Bill Clinton very CALMLY and steadily addressing a reporter and saying something like &#8220;you guys (media) are making this into something it isn&#8217;t, you&#8217;re stirring the pot.&#8221; THAT was their example of Bill Clinton yelling. He was not only clearly NOT yelling, but his statement seemed very appropriate in light of ridiculousness of the pre-South Carolina primary. And the CNN report made his point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sven</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>Finally.

Mr. Feldman, you hit the nail on the head. The media coverage of the two democratic candidates borders on irresponsible.  

Michelle Obama's personal criticisms of Hillary Clinton were mainly ignored by the press while Bill Clinton's criticisms of Barack Obama were villified.  Much more was made of Obama's wins than of Hillary's wins, and more is made of Obama gaining in the polls than of Clinton's leading in them.  What disturbs me most is the constant question of whether or not Senator Clinton can win in a general elction against McCain.  Recent national polls like that done by the LA Times have shown her ahead when matched head to head with Obama and again when matched head to head with McCain.  Why, then, isn't the press asking if OBAMA can win the general elction, when in all but one recent national poll he LOST head to head matches with McCain?

I guess we should ask Roland Martin over at CNN...now that CNN has had to admit that he is being paid by the Obama campaign.  Or maybe we should ask Chris Matthews, who was taken to task by Emily's List for his biased reporting and later made a public acknowledgement of and apology for that bias.

The press is making the news, not reporting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally.</p>
<p>Mr. Feldman, you hit the nail on the head. The media coverage of the two democratic candidates borders on irresponsible.  </p>
<p>Michelle Obama&#8217;s personal criticisms of Hillary Clinton were mainly ignored by the press while Bill Clinton&#8217;s criticisms of Barack Obama were villified.  Much more was made of Obama&#8217;s wins than of Hillary&#8217;s wins, and more is made of Obama gaining in the polls than of Clinton&#8217;s leading in them.  What disturbs me most is the constant question of whether or not Senator Clinton can win in a general elction against McCain.  Recent national polls like that done by the LA Times have shown her ahead when matched head to head with Obama and again when matched head to head with McCain.  Why, then, isn&#8217;t the press asking if OBAMA can win the general elction, when in all but one recent national poll he LOST head to head matches with McCain?</p>
<p>I guess we should ask Roland Martin over at CNN&#8230;now that CNN has had to admit that he is being paid by the Obama campaign.  Or maybe we should ask Chris Matthews, who was taken to task by Emily&#8217;s List for his biased reporting and later made a public acknowledgement of and apology for that bias.</p>
<p>The press is making the news, not reporting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3766</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3766</guid>
		<description>Now you have stumbled upon the best kept secret in politics: Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter are one and the same person!  This no doubt explains for the first time what drove Bill To Monica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you have stumbled upon the best kept secret in politics: Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter are one and the same person!  This no doubt explains for the first time what drove Bill To Monica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sphynx</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Sphynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>Didn't say his smile was fake (though I see that it was my grammatical error not your reading error).  It should have read "pasting a fake smile that looks like a Jimmy Carter smile".  Everytime she smiles, I see an unintentional Jimmy Carter resemblance in the smile.  Except hers seems entirely pasted on, not a real smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t say his smile was fake (though I see that it was my grammatical error not your reading error).  It should have read &#8220;pasting a fake smile that looks like a Jimmy Carter smile&#8221;.  Everytime she smiles, I see an unintentional Jimmy Carter resemblance in the smile.  Except hers seems entirely pasted on, not a real smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3764</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>Too bad you think President Carter's smile is fake....word in Georgia has it that he is an Obama supporter and may soon endorse him.
Better send an email to Jimmy to stop him from making a fool of himself!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad you think President Carter&#8217;s smile is fake&#8230;.word in Georgia has it that he is an Obama supporter and may soon endorse him.<br />
Better send an email to Jimmy to stop him from making a fool of himself!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sphynx</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/comment-page-1/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sphynx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/29/why-a-biased-press-has-decided-to-openly-back-barack-obama-over-hillary-clinton/#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>What's this?  Suddenly it is alright for me to vote?  I thought you were so keen on inhibiting my rights to do so since I disagree with your viewpoint and in doing so got classified as moronic, a fool, and ill-informed.  

Anyhows, given a choice between Rudy or Clinton, hell, given a choice between Michelle Obama or Mrs Clinton, my vote would definitely go to Rudy or Mrs Obama.  At least with them I don't feel like someone's lying into my face and pasting a fake Jimmy Carter smile on at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s this?  Suddenly it is alright for me to vote?  I thought you were so keen on inhibiting my rights to do so since I disagree with your viewpoint and in doing so got classified as moronic, a fool, and ill-informed.  </p>
<p>Anyhows, given a choice between Rudy or Clinton, hell, given a choice between Michelle Obama or Mrs Clinton, my vote would definitely go to Rudy or Mrs Obama.  At least with them I don&#8217;t feel like someone&#8217;s lying into my face and pasting a fake Jimmy Carter smile on at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
