<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PREDICTION: HILLARY WILL WIN DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION&#8211;NO QUESTION!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/</link>
	<description>Commentary &#038; Journalistic Satire (And a bit of media advice to boot)</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: manifest Money</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-17545</link>
		<dc:creator>manifest Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-17545</guid>
		<description>nice post Thnx dude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post Thnx dude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11285</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-11285</guid>
		<description>I guess you were wrong about Clinton. 

"As Walter Cronkite used to say–And that’s the way it is!"

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you were wrong about Clinton. </p>
<p>&#8220;As Walter Cronkite used to say–And that’s the way it is!&#8221;</p>
<p> <img src='http://thefeldmanblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-8801</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-8801</guid>
		<description>Well, there it is from Brian's comment: "Ok statisticaly she would win. But hes the better candidate which is what an election comes down to."

Negative. You just refuted your own comment within itself. It's about getting votes, and who will produce the most for their party in the general election. Yep, that's called "Statistically winning" which is what counts and makes the candidate "better". 

That would be like a country ignoring the olympic trials, putting thier slower athletes in and saying "Well, yeah this guy is slower but he's just BETTER."  Yeah, forget substance, forget results...just go with BETTER.

Obama has been basically campaigning against himself all this time. and Hillary has just been there...waiting. Get him away from a teleprompter and he's a bumbling, stumbling fool. No substance, no decisiveness, not impressed and frankly...I just don't believe him.

After seeing Barrack "millhouse" Obama aka The Messiah, I have a lot more respect for Hillary Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there it is from Brian&#8217;s comment: &#8220;Ok statisticaly she would win. But hes the better candidate which is what an election comes down to.&#8221;</p>
<p>Negative. You just refuted your own comment within itself. It&#8217;s about getting votes, and who will produce the most for their party in the general election. Yep, that&#8217;s called &#8220;Statistically winning&#8221; which is what counts and makes the candidate &#8220;better&#8221;. </p>
<p>That would be like a country ignoring the olympic trials, putting thier slower athletes in and saying &#8220;Well, yeah this guy is slower but he&#8217;s just BETTER.&#8221;  Yeah, forget substance, forget results&#8230;just go with BETTER.</p>
<p>Obama has been basically campaigning against himself all this time. and Hillary has just been there&#8230;waiting. Get him away from a teleprompter and he&#8217;s a bumbling, stumbling fool. No substance, no decisiveness, not impressed and frankly&#8230;I just don&#8217;t believe him.</p>
<p>After seeing Barrack &#8220;millhouse&#8221; Obama aka The Messiah, I have a lot more respect for Hillary Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alien</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-8110</link>
		<dc:creator>alien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-8110</guid>
		<description>yeah, so much for that hard prediction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, so much for that hard prediction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott C</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-6360</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-6360</guid>
		<description>Tonight Obama will win the nomination.

Clinton will bow out of the race tomorrow.

This article is as wrong as one can get.

Obama 2008!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight Obama will win the nomination.</p>
<p>Clinton will bow out of the race tomorrow.</p>
<p>This article is as wrong as one can get.</p>
<p>Obama 2008!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-5822</guid>
		<description>By the way, this is the only site that matches the google query "Hillary Clinton can't lose". All the other matches are "Hillary Clinton can't win" or "Hillary Clinton will lose". Maybe that tells something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, this is the only site that matches the google query &#8220;Hillary Clinton can&#8217;t lose&#8221;. All the other matches are &#8220;Hillary Clinton can&#8217;t win&#8221; or &#8220;Hillary Clinton will lose&#8221;. Maybe that tells something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-5821</guid>
		<description>He's got much more money - from guys that don't like Bush, but don't like the poor getting any money, either. And somehow, money seems to count more than Latinos, women and registered democrats. Maybe because they don't have it. Check, check, check - Obama will win! But the US may lose (except the rich guys).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s got much more money - from guys that don&#8217;t like Bush, but don&#8217;t like the poor getting any money, either. And somehow, money seems to count more than Latinos, women and registered democrats. Maybe because they don&#8217;t have it. Check, check, check - Obama will win! But the US may lose (except the rich guys).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lois Kruger</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5452</link>
		<dc:creator>Lois Kruger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-5452</guid>
		<description>I am white, female,82years old and 100% behind Obama. He will be the best president for the United States and the world. I think the world will think we aren't so bad if we elect a man out of the traditional mold.  I think this man is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us to do the right thing.  Experience?  Does being a first lady stand for experience.  Then Laura Bush should be a candidate.  She also is surrounded by experienced politicians. Let's do the right thing.I'd worry about a president who is called at 2:00 a.m. and is hallucinating because she is "sleep deprived".We don't want the Clintons in the white house again, and an impeached ex-president besides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am white, female,82years old and 100% behind Obama. He will be the best president for the United States and the world. I think the world will think we aren&#8217;t so bad if we elect a man out of the traditional mold.  I think this man is a once in a lifetime opportunity for us to do the right thing.  Experience?  Does being a first lady stand for experience.  Then Laura Bush should be a candidate.  She also is surrounded by experienced politicians. Let&#8217;s do the right thing.I&#8217;d worry about a president who is called at 2:00 a.m. and is hallucinating because she is &#8220;sleep deprived&#8221;.We don&#8217;t want the Clintons in the white house again, and an impeached ex-president besides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-4282</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-4282</guid>
		<description>LOL.  I love seeing the Clintonites make fools of themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  I love seeing the Clintonites make fools of themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLee</title>
		<link>http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>DLee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefeldmanblog.com/2008/01/19/prediction-hillary-will-win-democratic-nomination-no-question/#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>I think you had better take a good re-look at the polls....and the primaries that have just been taken by Barack.  She will lose - the Clinton corruption tags along behind her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you had better take a good re-look at the polls&#8230;.and the primaries that have just been taken by Barack.  She will lose - the Clinton corruption tags along behind her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

