He’s losing it. President Obama that is. Obamamania has apparently come and gone–at least among college students.

A new Associated Press-mtvU poll shows just 47 percent of college students now support Obama’s leadership; 27 percent don’t think he is doing such a hot job running the country.

In May of 2009, 60 percent of college students surveyed gave Obama the thumbs up; 15 percent had a negative view then.

The big concern is that this waning support for the president will translate into a much smaller turnout for the midterm elections and, therefore, an increased chance the Republicans will reclaim control of the House.

Student expectations for Obama were so high during the presidential campaign, there was always the danger of major disappointment once it became apparent that Obama is not a miracle worker. This is what is happening now.

The question now is, will many of these disillusioned students simply drop out of the political process altogether, or turn to  either the GOP or a third party to express their political views?

• 9 Comments

For desperate airlines, safety is taking a back seat in coach to economics as they press to get their planes back into the skies over Europe even though the volcano in Iceland is, once again, apparently spewing out impressive amounts of ash into the atmosphere over many Northern (and some Southern) European countries.

Under intense pressure from the airlines, losing an estimated $200 million each day, European air safety officials have carved the airspace over Europe into sort of a layer cake–with some layers being deemed safe enough for a jetliner to fly through, while other layers are still thought to be off-limits.

But a leading aviation expert, Dr. Brent Bowen, head of the Department of Aviation Technology at Purdue University has put out a news release warning that “getting back in the air too soon could endanger lives.”

He argues there have really been no conclusive or even extensive scientific tests to determine whether the limited air spaces now available to commercial air travel really are safe to traverse?

The problem is, any damage to airliners may not be immediately observable. But that doesn’t make the potential ramifications any less severe.

Would airlines deliberately put their aircraft, crews and passengers in danger just because of—–money?

What do YOU think?

For More Commentary, Please Visit www.notimetothinkbook.com, The Official Website For THE Media Book Of 2010, No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle. Now In Paperback Edition!

• 0 Comments

The hottest news in the aviation world is the recent announcement by the Federal Aviation Administration that pilots flying commercial flights (and other types of aircraft) will now be allowed to take four of the most popular antidepressants while continuing to fly paying passengers.

The evidence seems clear that the medications do more good than harm and the issue has been studied carefully by the FAA, which usually comes down on the side of extreme caution.

But the funny thing is, considering the current state of commercial flying in this country, it seems to me it is not the pilots who need to pop antidepressants, but the passengers.

Flying has become such a dismal affair, I think that it is about time the airlines dispense Prozac and Zoloft and Celexa and Lexapro right there on the aircraft.

They no longer serve food. And, you have to pay, it seems, for just about anything that used to be offered up as part of your fare. Now, it is not uncommon for airlines such as JetBlue and Virgin America and others to sell food and drinks on board–along with wifi, in some cases.

So, why not antidepressants? I bet there would be a huge market and the airlines could make tons of money on the pills!

More important, the passengers may end up having a happier experience than they currently do on domestic flights.

Nothing like a Lexapro and beer to make those flying hours just whiz on by!

For More Commentary, Please Visit www.notimetothinkbook.com, The Official Website For THE Media Book Of 2010, No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle. Now In Paperback Edition

• 3 Comments

It’s about time.

Finally, President Obama has gotten something of historical significance accomplished with the passage tonight of legislation that will radically and fundamentally change the way health care is delivered in this country.

And, while certainly not on the scale of the type of universal medical coverage Americans deserve–and their European counterparts, among others, already get–approval of this legislation will greatly increase medical coverage to an estimated tens of millions of those currently without health insurance.

It will also offer more protection for those who already have insurance but fear losing it should they get laid off from their job–which, nowadays, considering the economic condition of this country, is something every worker must give serious thought to.

If only Obama had become more personally involved in this fight from the get-go a year or so ago, maybe we’d be much further down the road by now?

We’ll probably never know what could have happened.

What we do know is what will happen: And, that is good for Americans and , yes, good for Barack Obama’s presidency, making it far easier for him now to get approval of other measures, such as overhauling regulation of the financial industry in this country.

For More Commentary, Please Visit www.notimetothinkbook.com, The Official Website For THE Media Book Of 2010,” No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle.” It Is Now Available In Paperback Edition!

• 0 Comments

Let’s face it. Toyota is just an easy target right now. Millions of its cars recalled because of rare cases of uncontrolled acceleration. The company says it can (and is) fixing the problem; critics claim it is missing the real problem: the complex, computer controlled electronic throttle system. None of this, however, should give the news media a free pass to stop critical thinking.

Earlier this past week, press reports were buzzing with news that a San Diego, California man had lost control of the Prius he was driving and needed the help of the California Highway Patrol to  safely slow the alleged runaway vehicle to a stop.

Now comes word via the Associated Press that Toyota investigators and the federal government have not been able to make the car, in tests, repeat the claimed unexpected performance, casting doubt, says the A.P. on the driver’s story.

The news agency bases its story on a draft memo it says it has obtained.

There was always something fishy about this particular San Diego story: Even the most critical government investigators have said the problem, whatever the cause, with the Toyota cars (Prius, of course, is the hybrid built by the company) is extremely rare. And yet, on the very same day Toyota was holding a news conference to announce how its planned fixes were going, along came this “new” episode that seemingly showed that the auto company was simply not on top of the situation.

Judging from the massive coverage this story got throughout all media platforms, apparently few news organizations bothered to, at least, cast a skeptical eye on this one story. Rather, most news accounts I saw, heard and read, seemed to accept what allegedly happened with this particular Prius as if it were an established fact.

It may, in the end, turn out that the driver was, indeed, telling the truth and his Prius did, without his input, reach speeds of 94 mph or greater. But there now also seems to be at least some evidence the entire experience may have been made up for reasons as yet unknown.

The next time there is a story about a runaway Prius or other Toyota, it would be nice if the news media were a bit more liberal with the use of the word—alleged!

For More Commentary, Please Visit www.notimetothinkbook.com, The Official Website For THE Media Book Of 2010, “No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle,” Now Available In Paperback Edition.

• 36 Comments

Maybe neither rain nor wind nor snow and all that other stuff can stop the postal service from delivering the mail, but, apparently, the rise of email can.

The postal service is saying that it is hurting so much from loss of revenue because of such things as email and private deliver companies, that it may need to cut Saturday mail delivery as well as overtime pay for employees.

Joseph Corbett, the chief financial officers for the post office, tells Reuters that the service is also planning what he called a “moderate” increase in the price of stamps.

I think people can probably live with paying a few more pennies for postage–though that might not be the case for businesses that rely on mass mailings.

But stopping mail delivery on Saturdays is another matter. I don’t think that will go over well with the public . And, since people will still want their mail delivered, my guess is stopping weekend deliveries would only force more people–if they can afford it–to give their business to the private delivery services resulting in even a larger loss of revenue for the U.S. Postal Service.

In February, says Reuters, USPS posted a loss of $297 million for the first quarter.

For More Commentary, Please Visit http://notimetothinkbook.com/, The Official Website For THE Media Book Of 2010, No Time To Think-The Menace of Media Speed and the 24-hour News Cycle. Soon In Paperback.

• 2 Comments